CCMS Constitutional and Governance issues
Copacabana Community Men’s Shed › Forums › Copa Men’s Shed Forum › CCMS Constitutional and Governance issues
Tagged: AGM, Constitution, Governance
- This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 1 day, 14 hours ago by Perihelion.
-
AuthorPosts
-
09/11/2026 at 8:21 PM #2184PerihelionParticipant
Why Our Constitution Matters
The CCMS Constitution is not just a legal document that sits in a folder. It is the set of rules we have agreed to follow in running our Shed.
It covers important matters such as how the committee is elected, how meetings are conducted, what rights members have, how decisions are made, how records are kept, and how changes to the way the Shed operates can be made.
Most of us joined the Shed to enjoy woodworking, learn new skills, contribute to the community and enjoy the company of other members — not to study constitutions. But a good constitution is essential to make all of those things possible by providing clear and fair rules when questions or disagreements arise.
This forum is intended to encourage members to become a little more familiar with our Constitution and to discuss how well it serves the Shed today.
You certainly don’t need to be an expert. Questions are encouraged.
If there is a clause you don’t understand, ask about it.
If you think something is unclear, say so.
If you think a provision works particularly well, tell us why.
If you see something that might need updating as the Shed evolves, put forward your suggestion.
Different opinions are most certainly welcome ! The purpose is not for everybody to agree, but to allow members to exchange ideas respectfully, understand the rules under which our Shed operates, and hopefully identify improvements that will make CCMS stronger in the future.
The Constitution belongs to all of us as members.
The more members who understand it and participate in discussions about it, the better equipped we are to make informed decisions about the future of our Shed based on factual information.
So please have a read, ask questions, contribute ideas and join the discussion.
12/11/2026 at 6:47 PM #2198PerihelionParticipantA discussion item at an AGM is not the same as a special resolution. If a proposal requires changing the Constitution, members must be given the complete proposed amendment and at least 21 days’ notice that it will be put as a special resolution.
As it is now less than 21 days before the rescheduled AGM on the 1st December 2026 a vote. on changing the constitution to admit women as shed members can not take place at that AGM.13/11/2026 at 5:51 PM #2201Alex FletcherParticipantPseudonym – You may not even be a member of CCMS. You are misrepresenting the committee’s intentions here. A “discussion item” in a meeting is designed to gauge if the members of a association wish to proceed with investigating a issue or change to the constitution in the future. The committee had no and never has any intention of changing the constitution at the AGM only to gauge support by the members to allow women members.
13/11/2026 at 10:20 PM #2202PerihelionParticipantAlex,
You seem to be quite angry!In the email from Garron on the 15th September 2026 in regards to the original AGM scheduled for Tuesday 27th Oct
the original committee did propose a change to the current constitution to allow women as members.
So there is no confusion, here is the exact portion of that email.Hello Shedders!
Please be advised that our Annual General Meeting will be held on Tuesday, October 27th at high noon.
The agenda will include the following:2. Change to the Constitution to allow ALL members from the community. Please see attached both the current version of the constitution and the proposed changes.
I have questioned whether that was the intention at the new AGM scheduled for December but have had no response. Except for your rather agitated response that is.
Communication is key to clear understanding. The message wasn’t clear and I had already been told by a committee member that the original constitution change was being re-inserted.
At least your post has clarified that issue, and I think you for that contribution.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
